The referees’ governing body has dominated that Mark Clattenburg has no case to answer after Southampton filed a complaint about his conduct in direction of Adam Lallana throughout the 2-1 defeat at Goodison Park final month.
PA PicturesMark Clattenburg has no case to reply.
Southampton accused Clattenburg of “abusing and insulting” captain Lallana after he had unsuccessfully appealed for a penalty when his cross appeared to strike Everton defender Antolin Alcaraz’s hand inside the world.
The south coast club wrote to Skilled Recreation Match Officers Restricted (PGMOL ) on New Yr’s Eve to register their complaint.
In a letter seen by the Press Association, the club claimed Clattenburg told Lallana: “You’re very completely different now, since you have performed for England – you by no means used to be like this.”
After a evaluation, PGMOL dominated that Clattenburg had no case to reply and that the referee, who takes cost of the FA Cup tie between Arsenal and Tottenham on Saturday, may continue to officiate as planned.
An announcement said: “PGMOL is dedicated to constructive dialogue and communication with clubs, managers and gamers.
“On Dec. 31, PGMOL acquired a letter from Southampton, who raised issues concerning the conduct of Mark Clattenburg following their game with Everton.
“In a written response to Southampton, PGMOL acknowledge that their criticism has been considered in full.
“However, given the nature of the dialog with the participant, having reviewed the footage and spoken to the team of officers in addition to the Premier League Match Delegate it has been found that there isn’t a case to answer.”
St Mary’s boss Mauricio Pochettino was vital of Clattenburg’s choice-making after the Everton game, saying his facet should have been awarded not one however two spot-kicks.
He mentioned: “I don’t imply any disrespect against any referees, however anybody watching the sport can see there were two clear penalties that weren’t given or ought to have been given.”
Pochettino stated he believed his aspect’s “young and friendly” image was costing them choices in massive video games.
“We have now been suffering all season long,” he mentioned. “Many injustices have gone against us. It’s simpler to referee a Southampton side that are all young, pleasant players. It is vitally straightforward to have selections not go for us. It is a lot simpler to have selections to go against us.
“We simply need Southampton to be refereed with the same rigour as all different clubs are judged. We wish the identical remedy as all other clubs. Nothing better, nothing worse – simply the identical.
“We do not want to be judged by the young, good-looking players that we now have. We don’t wish to be judged in that sense. We need to be judged in the same manner, being judged by the identical rigour, in the identical way that each one other golf equipment are.”
Info from the Press Association was used on this report.